Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Kodak/Ilford consistency; was X-mas Tree Test
From: "C.M. Fortunko" <fortunko@boulder.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 14:30:49 -0700

Bill,

I am using my V35 with color head. I recently bought a great book on B&W
printing from Silver Press. This great English printer (Darryl?) also used
the V35 but recommended not using the built-in filters. Do you have any
experience with below-lens filters on V35?

Chris



At 04:00 PM 2/3/97 -0800, you wrote:
>C.M. Fortunko wrote:
>> ...
>> Incidentally, I do my own B&W printing on Kodak VC paper. It is really great
>> fun. For some reason, I seem to get more consistent results than on Ilford
>> materials. Can someone shed some light on this. What am I doing wrong?
>> 
>
>Chris:  One possible explanation for the difficulty you are encountering 
>may be the filters. Are you using Kodak VC filters on the Ilford 
>Multigrade IV paper? If so, invest in a set of Ilford filters. There are 
>differences. While each brand's will work on the other's paper, the tonal 
>response is different and less predictable. Switching filters made a big 
>difference for me. I found I got much better results when I used the 
>Ilford filters. I also like the Kodak Polymax II RC paper out now (with 
>the Kodak filters). But I prefer the Ilford products in both RC and 
>fiber. 
>     Of course, if you like the results you're getting with Kodak, stick 
>with that. 
>     By the way, if you normally use Tri-X, you might want to experiment 
>with HP5+ in your Leicas. (See, we got back on topic.) It has the 
>familiar grain pattern and tonal range, but with (to my eye) slightly 
>less grain. It is also more pushable. I use both, as well as Tmax 3200 
>and 100.
>     Good luck.
>
>Bill Welch
>
>
>
>