Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sheesh, I'm gonna sound like some kinda cheerleader for the Nikkor 85/2 after all this, but if anyone wants to see a couple pictures made with this supposedly flawed optic that demonstrate to me that all this talk of flaws and low contrast is just rubbish, send me a note and be prepared to view a couple of 100K JPEG files. These are two images I know I took with the 85/2 a year or three back, and were PhotoCD rendered direct from the negatives at processing time. Hans Pahlen already had a gander at the two images and stated, "Well, You have convinced me that your 85/2 can produce excellent image quality." Now, whether their quality control was somewhat variable in the line and whether it's better than the older 85/1.8, well, at this great distance in time (20+ years) I can't quite remember exactly which of the great negatives I made with the old 1.8 I have prints from handy, nor can I easily remember which of the tons of other negs I have were taken with the 85/2 or 105/2.5, both of which are great optics. The very fact that it's difficult to distinguish between these two lenses' pictures says to me that the 82/2 is a damn fine lens, the 105/2.5 has been classed as another one of the 'special' lenses by photographers for 30 years. To return to the Leica, I owned an early 90/2 Summicron when I owned my M4-P (sold last October). It's a fine lens, although I understand later model 90mm lenses are better (and lighter!). Negatives taken with it are sharp and contrasty, but I don't see much difference between them and the 85/2, 105/2.5, 85/1.8 in the Nikkor line. Perhaps the later Summicron and Elmarit series step ahead of the Nikkors, I can't say as I've never had the pleasure. Now I'm really going to get into trouble. The sharpest, contrastiest, sweetest 85-90mm lens I've ever used was a Zeiss T* lens for my Contax SLR which I owned in 1984-5. The second sharpest lens of this category, but a little shorter, was the 75mm Zeiss Tessar f/3.5 lens on my Rolleiflex MXV-EV Type 2, used with a Rolleikin 35mm adapter for doing portraits. <Hey Marc, you gonna start a Zeiss/Contax list before I get drummed outta here? I'm still looking at that Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta B... > ;) Godfrey