Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:58 PM 08-12-96 -0700, Ben wrote: >I looked at one of these last nite and compared it side-by-side to a 35/2-M. >I found that when collapsed and focused to infinity the Elamr is but a scant >bit shorter than the Summicron. What's the point of having a collapsable >lens that isn't much more compact than it's peers? I'm aware of the recent 50/2.8 collapsible Elmar; is there now a 35 collapsible Elmar? Dan C.