Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]uh3b207@hpmail.lrz-muenchen.de wrote: > Until then I have seen another Hektor with a similar price. Why > it is so cheap compared with other lenses? Is there indeed > some flaw in the design that I have not noticed up to now? > Or it is just a market phenomenon (no one wants to buy it; > there are so many of them)? What do you think? > > Regards, Rainer Mueller > Munich, Germany I use two 135 lenses, the Hektor in M mount and the 2.8 with "eyes." Both are excellent. I have been told the Hektor is "slow" ... and that seems to be the general "wisdom." Perhaps it is slow at F4.5, however the images appear to be as sharp and contrasty as the F2.8 version. In addition, it is much lighter! Glenn