Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What follows is a quote of a article by Bob Schwalberg: "A 50 mm lens is also superb for environmental portraits that relate = people to their surround and who they are by showing what they do and = where they do. According to conventional wisdom the 50 mm is no supposed = to be so great for formal head end shoulders portraiture, which is = considered to lie within the domain of 85 to 105 medium telephoto = lenses. Theo Kisselbach. the late director of the Leica School of = Weztlar began to think otherwise in the 1960s. Kiba ( As he was known to = his friends )pointed out that modern films and developers are at least = twice as good as their inmediate ancestors, but the 90 mm lens ( the = Leitz medium focal lentgh ) is less than twice as long as a standar 50 = mm lens. To test this, he made many portraits and other medium tele style shots = using his 50mm lens, but conmposing with 90mm framelines of his Leica = M.Because his 90 shot with 50 pictures were shot from yhe longer 90 mm = lens distances,the perspective was unchanged, and the high quality of = modern films proved that despite the extra enlargement needed to produce = equal sized prints,there was virtually no loss of quality. Kiba=B4s point = =ADwhich wasn=B4t much liked by some people in the sales department=ADwas t= hat = a 50mm can easyly replace a 90mm, thanks to progress in photograpic = chemistry and improvements of lens design and manufacture" This article was written 20 years ago. = Lets beguin to draw our own conclusions Jose Luis Gonzalez