Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/10/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The CLE best features are: 1) The only M Mount camera to date which offers Aperture priority exposure 2) the only M Mount camera to date which offers TTL flash with M lenses Note that the CLE's flash is rather small. The larger Minolta TTL flashes would probably work fine on the CLE, but I have not had this confirmed by Minolta. 3) the BEST and largest built in 28 mm finder (yes, much better and easier to see than the M4P/M6) 4) the best RF/VF system in any 35, excepting the M series 5) to date one of only four cameras (M5,CL,CLE,M6) which offers TTL 6) the second smallest size of any M mount camera (after the CL) 7) an excellent metering system reading off the shutter curtain or film plane 8) a set of three great multicoated lenses, although the 28 is not as good as the 28 Elmarit 9) framelines for the 28/40/90 10) the only M mount camera which has a swing open back 11) the only M mount camera with the accuracy of an electronic shutter The CLE's chief problems are 1) no meter when the camera is set on manual 2) dead batteries mean a dead camera 3) an awkwardly placed on/off switch. a switch placed around the shutter speed dial or release would have been much better. The CL's better features include: 1) smallest and lightest M mount camera 2) to date one of only four cameras (M5,CL,CLE,M6) which offers TTL 3) a working shutter even if the batteries die 4) a good, but not great, RF/VF 5) framelines for the 40/50/90 The CL's main problem seems to be its reliability, although there are definitely conflicting reports. I have never had any trouble with the shutter or metering, but lots of people have. I know from a former Leica tech that the camera when through six internal design changes in its short life. The various editions may well account for the different reliability reports. CL/CLE/M Lenses & Compatibility CL Lenses were made with a different type of focusing cam than traditional Leica M Lenses. Traditional lenses have a cam which moves PARALLEL to the film plane as it moves back and forth from its near and far focusing distances. CL lenses, in contrast, have a slanted cam which mates with the RF follower. At the time of manufacture, Leica made a big deal out of saying that the CL lenses "MAY NOT WORK PROPERLY" on the M cameras due the differences of the cams. Recently a lot of people have been suspecting that the CL lenses work just fine on the other M cameras, and that the warning at the time was just marketing. I know that in the several dozen CL lenses I have tried, they all focus to the same distance whether they are mounted on a CL or on a M camera. This issue is a matter of hot dispute, depending a lot upon how much you trust father Leitz. CLE lenses, in contrast to the CL lenses, have the traditional Leica type focusing cam and will work fine on any M mount camera. How to tell the difference between Minolta CL and CLE Lenses? 1) the above mentioned focusing cam 2) the 28 was made ONLY for the CLE 3) CLE lenses are labeled "M-Rokkor" note that the CLE lenses are multi-coated, while the CL lenses are not Most M lenses work fine on the CL and CLE, the main exceptions being 1) the earlier 21's and 28's with the large rear elements 2) don't collapse a lens into the CL or CLE body 3) the 35/50/135's with eyes block portions of the smaller camera RF/VF windows In use, I find both the CL or CLE to be a pleasure. If you are searching for a small M body or a less expensive TTL camera than the M6, either of these cameras are fine choices as far as I am concerned, though admittedly the CLE is the more advanced camera. Its worth noting that both the CL and CLE had relatively low productions. The Leica Pocket book tells us that the allocated CL production was 65,000 BUT that production was lower. Based upon how often I see the CLE, I would guess production was only about 1/4 of the CL. You can read the test of the CLE in the June of 1981 issue of Modern Photo. The CL is covered by Modern in a test on 11/73, inside construction on 8/74, and the Minolta CL on 8/77. Shutterbug ran an article on the CL in 2/84. The rarest CL is the 50th Anniversary model, of which 3,500 were made. The rarest CLE is the GOLD model, whose production was probably in the hundreds. This is in contrast to the over 225,000 M3's made. Stephen Gandy