Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Someone asked for opinions on the 75/1.4 Summilux-M; here is mine: I've been using this lens for about six months on an M6 & M4-P. Its primary use has been indoors under available light with PKL and NHG. Initially, I borrowed one from one of the local dealers for a week before deciding to get one myself. I have been using a 5 element 90/2 Summicron-M for 8 years (on the same M bodies) and have gotten to know its characteristics. I've shot test targets with other lenses but haven't with this one. For me, I believed that the best test was to use it under the conditions where I expected to use use it most of the time. The first thing I noticed about the 75/1.4 was that the contrast seemed high at large apertures in the near focus range. My 90/2 gets slightly softer in contrast under the same conditions and I've grown to like it a lot when shooting people. I think this character of the 75/1.4 is good (for the right subject) but on this point, I'm still adjusting. Part of my original rationalization for picking up the 75/1.4 was that I am less than satisfied with the size of the 90mm frames in the M6. The 75mm markings always looked like a good alternative to having my range/viewfinder swapped out for that of an M3. The different focal length of the 75/1.4 ended up being more noticable to me in print than I had imaged. I think this was a result of my tendency to do tight portraits with these focal lengths. This is the fastest lens I own. I like the extra speed. The loaner I borrowed was nicely broken in and the focus ring was very smooth to use. I could make very small compensations with little effort. Most of my images had the plane of critical focus very near the intended point under 10x magnification. My newer one is a bit stiffer to focus. I'm missing a few more shots as a result. Considering the DOF is barely the thickness of a pencil at 1 meter, this lens really tests my eye for being able to align the rangefinder images. I sometimes wonder if a bright SLR screen with such a lens might not work nearly as well. To keep a short story moderate: I've long considered my 90/2 to be a "keeper". I've been interested in the new 90/2.8 Elmarit-M but would probably use it for different things. To my mind, the jury is still out on the 75/1.4. It has returned some beautiful images - particularly with strong backlight. I currently do not own a 50mm lens but am planning to pick something up. I might give up the 75/1.4 for a fast 50... ...or not. - Kevin kburke@iterated.com