Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: Re: numbers on Summicron focusing ring, again
From: "Jordan Koussis" <jkoussis@compulink.gr>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:04:17 +0300

The exact focal length may differ in lenses of the same DAY of production,
not only for Leica lenses, but for every manufacturer.

Jordan.

----------
> From: Thomas Knoles <tgk@mwa.org>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: numbers on Summicron focusing ring, again
> Date: Παρασκευή, 13 Σεπτεμβρίου 1996 3:58 μμ
> 
> 
> Thanks to those who explained the "22" on my Summicron focusing ring.  
> Now, my next question.  My black 50mm Summicron, which is #3,618,xxx, is 
> engraved with a "22," but in Eastland's _Leica M Compendium_ there is a 
> photo of a chrome specimen serial number 3,606,xxx which is engraved 
> "19."  
> 
> Why would the actual focal lengths of these two lenses be different when 
> they were presumably manufactured within a couple of years of each other?

> Wouldn't this need to be due to a change in the design of the lens?? 
> 
> Thanks for any input on this,
> 
> Tom Knoles
> tgk@mwa.org