Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: MR4 meters
From: "C.M. Fortunko" <fortunko@boulder.nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 16:44:41 -0600

Jack,

But why do you need so many cameras of similar capabilities. Is it not like
having many wives. For me, one is sometimes too much.

Best regards,

Chris


At 12:46 PM 8/10/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Fred:
>
>I think/hope that you have given THE DEFINITIVE statement about light
meters...be they 
>built-in, reflected light (and  fairly useless) or incident-light
reading...and giving 
>the truest (although still nowhere near perfect) reading.
>
>Once again, this "gary hair" nominates you for the "atta-boy" award!!!
>
>And if only ONE reader heeds your pearl of wisdom...it's worthwhile, Fred!
>
>There's always hope!
>
>In the meantime, I have discovered that one can buy Leica CL's and CLE's
for example, 
>with non-operable light meters for CHEAP, CHEAP, CHEAP...and since I mainly
use 
>Sekonic incident light meters (very much like the old reliable Westons,
Fred) I'm in 
>business. Just this past week, I bought a Leica CL with non-operable light
meter, 
>complete with 40mm f/2 Summicron in "9" condition otherwise, for $125.00! 
>
>I also  bought two Rollei 35S cameras, with 2.8 Sonnar lenses (German) for
a total of 
>$135.00...again because their built-in meters didn't function...although
everything 
>else is 100%
>
>
>Geese, maybe it would be to my advantage if too many people didn't heed
your post!
>
>Cordially,
>Jack Hamilton
>Milwaukee, Wisconsin USA
>
>