Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Eric wrote: >I don't think Fuji is justified in dumping paper on the >U.S. market like they were a couple years ago, but as >far as I hear it, you can buy Kodak film in many places >in Japan. Is that not true? >From what I can see here in Tokyo, Kodak products seem pretty widely available. In fact I believe Yodobashi Camera stocks just about every Kodak film currently made, even stuff for aerial photography. Their film basement is pretty astounding, sort of an entire refrigerated floor where you walk around with shopping baskets like in a supermarket; they've also got all the Agfas, all the Ilfords, Fuji and Konica naturally, and some bizarre and dead-cheap East European stuff with funny names I'm afraid to touch. Most of the bigger shops and many of the 1hr photo places carry at least some Kodak. Outside of Tokyo is probably another matter, and maybe that's the bone of contention: out in smaller cities and towns it's pretty much Fuji. I don't really know the specifics of Kodak's claim, other than to point to the obvious market-share statistics. But low market share doesn't automatically mean unfair market practices. If you ask the ordinary person in the street---like the Japanese I work with in my office---they just say they prefer Fuji: they think the colors are more natural. Sort of like people in North America were a generation ago: Kodak was simply the best and they wouldn't dream of using anything else. But I think Kodak will eventually gain a bigger following here; they are really starting to advertise a lot and they sponsor a popular soccer team (who all wear "Kodak" emblazoned across their jerseys). They have quite a TV campaign going also, featuring young, rebellious, "with it" Japanese doing things like tipping over a dinner table and photographing the result with a Kodak instant camera. Adrian