Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Re: Leica fast ?
From: oguillemain@agora.fdn.fr (Olivier Guillemain)
Date: 05 Jun 1996 13:01:24 GMT
Organization: La Federation Continentale

> In the the first place, you will have to decide if you want a
> rangefinder
> camera (with the given limitations, AND advantages), or not.=20
> If you really want a rangefinder camera, you should choose between an
> AF-Contax G1,
> or the MF Leica M6. Judged from your questions, maybe you will prefer
> the
> Contax,
> that has: motor wind and rewind, DX-coding, TTL flash, etc.
> Why do I prefer the M6? Well, I do not like the small G1 finder and the
> noisy rewind.
> And I prefer the Leica lenses.

Hans, thank you for your answer

AF-Contax G: the AF is useful only if it is fast. AF-Contax is very slow
AF-Contax G: lack of accuracy of the focus. The AF collectors are not enough
far-off
AF-Contax G: is noisy
AF-Contax G: the M6 viewfinder with frame is very much better

motor wind and rewind : I'm not interested in. 
DX-coding : not very important
I rarely use the 1000/th: I can to pass but 1/2000 is nevertheless usefull
(400 iso a sunny day)

TTL flash : usefull for fill in. The leica users dont like fill in because...
  because fill in isn't simple with an M6. It's the only real reason !
exposure : very important to make creative photography and to control your
results
loading of the film with two part ? you can drop it on the dust

It 's only the tree last arguments which bother me

Regards Olivier


 -------------------------------------
|         Olivier Guillemain          |
|                                     |
|         Responsable reseau          |
|  e-mail: oguillemain@agora.fdn.fr   |
|                                     |
|             Carpe diem              |
 -------------------------------------

Replies: Reply from "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk> (Re: Leica fast ?)