Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: ASPH vs Aspheric
From: Fred Ward <fward@erols.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 10:32:42 -0500
Organization: Gem Book Publishers
References: <199606020422.VAA16175@dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com>

Bill,

Thanks for your comments. 

Color negative films and 1-hour processing have done more to degrade 
photographhy than any single combination. People expect nothing today, 
and usually get it. The convenience is grand; the results are nothing 
short of awful, usually, but do fill a need and do provide people with 
fast, cheap prints. 
 
The negative films are probably about the same, but Kodak, for one, does 
still have a broad line of color negative choices for a reason. The 
unknown and uncontrolled variable is the local 1-hour mall shop or drug 
store run by high school dropouts who scratch negatives, operate dirty 
machines, and couldn't care less about anything. 

We have two such operations in our village and I use both. In my gem 
books I usually have 4-10 pictures (of about 100-120 total) that I scan 
from the negatives I shoot. I take the film up, have a cup of coffee, 
wait, and just use the terrible prints as a proof sheet because their 
colors bear no relationship to what I shot or what is in the neg. 
 
So, I suspect that your Florida experience was processor differences. 
All 1-hour machines are auto-everything. They cannot handle any of the 
usual exposure-reading problems everyone faces.... light backgrounds, 
dark backgrounds, etc.  I photography jewelry and gems for my books on 
either black or white backgrounds, since I drop them out in PHotoshop 
anyway. You should see the mess I get back in the 4x6 prints. Awful. I 
shoot these with studio strobes and meter them with a Minolta III flash 
meter, so I know the exposures are right on.... and the negs prove that. 
But the prints are awful because the auto-exposure machines (unless  
manually overridden) average the exposure and ruin the prints. 
 
Pointing out this detail to the operators is hopeless.... so I no longer 
try. Just give me the negs and let me scan them in and use them. 
 
The only way to get anything like a side-by-side test would be to shoot 
the same film as your Canon user and have them run through the same 
machine at the same time using the same chemicals and paper. 

Fred Ward

In reply to: Message from photo-op@ix.netcom.com (Sherril & Bill) (Re: ASPH vs Aspheric)