Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Lens Cleaning
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 08:27:29 -0400
Cc: rollei@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

At 03:11 PM 5/29/96 +1200, Michael Moffatt wrote:

>I was lead to believe (today in fact) by an excellent repairer, that the
>inside elements of leitz lens' (in this case an old M-series Summarit) had
>a liquidish type coating that is smudged or removed ON CONTACT...


Close, but not quite the whole story.  Alexander Smakula perfected lens
coatings in 1935 whilst at Zeiss;  this involved the application of fluoride
deposits by means of vacuum coatings.  Zeiss immediately obtained a patent
on this, which was "close-held" for military reasons until 1940.  The patent
then had a 20-year life.  So, until 1960, no other German manufacturer could
use vacuum coating technologies.

Leitz, and others, used 'drip coating' techniques which left a moist
coating.  This coating is quite soft and, often, dries in a pattern similar
to that of a lake-bed -- minute cracks quite visible under magnification.
Many dealers don't know about this and will describe a lens as having 'wipe
marks' when, in fact, all it needs is a couple of weeks in John Van
Stelten's hands to have the front element recoated.

The coating of internal elements only was a frequent result;  even Zeiss did
this on some late Prewar lenses.  A coating on an internal element does not
dry so readily.

The use of vacuum coatings was independently developed in the US -- by
Wollensak, I believe -- and in the UK a few years after Smakula's work, so
the Zeiss patents did not apply in these countries.

Marc
msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!


Replies: Reply from Michael Volow <mvolo@acpub.duke.edu> (Re: Lens Cleaning)