Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/05/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Kodak films
From: Edward Meyers <aghalide@phantom.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 10:47:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us



On Sat, 4 May 1996, lynn vavra wrote:

> Laurnet,
> Thanks for the tip.  It took me several days before I realized you had 
> sent me this mail, sorry for the delay.  
> 
> Thanks again,
> George
> 
> On Thu, 2 May 1996, Laurent Saminadayar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi there!
> > Here's some comment on the T-max film:
> > Personnally, I use a lot the T-max 3200 that I push at 6400. I process it in T-max soup, in a professionnal lab (Pictorial Service in Paris or equivalent). The result is wonderful! The grain is more pronouced than with a 400, but quite resonable, and you can make picture without flash in any circonstance. The only problem is to find a lab that process it very well:it's very expensive, but that's the price to have good picture at the light of a candle!
> > Regards.
> > Laurent
> > saminad@amoco.saclay.cea.fr
> > 
> 
When P3200 was first introduced some years ago I tested it with
Tetenal Emofin developer. Results were amazingly good. Also,
remember that P3200 is not ISO 3,200. The 3200 number means that
you can use it at 3200, but results do not have the excellent
shadow detail when used at the true ISO 1,000 or 1,200 that it
really has. Ed Meyers

In reply to: Message from lynn vavra <hbedu014@dewey.csun.edu> (Re: Kodak films)