Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Excerpts from mail: 23-Apr-96 Re: self-intro by tmydosh@servtech.com > What is a "dry curtain"? I've seen this term in ads, etc., and asked Marc Small (who of course can speak for himself at this point), who said it meant just that: curtain material dried out, mostly from inactivity. One result (and what I meant to convey) is that such curtains typically leak light, a la pinholes. All three bodies the net seller sent me did that, 'tho with the last it did not show on test exposures. I put all three to this test (with ISO 100 or 200 color neg. film): with the iris open to f/2 and the shutter wound, I uncapped the lens and pointed the camera at the sky (no, not directly at old sol!) for 20-30 seconds. Capped, released. That tested the leading curtain. Still capped, wound on, released, uncapped, pointed at sky again. Recapped. That tested the trailing curtain. The two frames should have been entirely clear, but there were exposed spots. All three bodies showed this. The first two also showed corresponding white spots on the prints. The third did not: apparently its leakge was not severe enough to show up in ordinary use (camera around neck between pics, stopped down to 5.6 or 8, not usually pointed at sky). In light of the mixed results described, I guess one could call the above a pretty severe test. OTOH, the purpose of a shutter is to control the passage of light, all or none, eh? And for what I had paid this seller, I didn't think I should have to invest additional having the curtains replaced. Stan Yoder Pittsburgh