Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1995/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]-- [ From: Jack Hamilton * EMC.Ver #2.3 ] -- I meant the older f 1.2 Noctilux...so maybe I was wrong with the example...but "right with the meaning." In fact, the following message to me clarifies the point. In many cases several heads (belonging to Leica list readers) are better than one (my dumb Irish brain). So I need the words of this exchange... Cordially, Jack Hamilton Milwaukee, Wisconsin USA -------- REPLY, Original message follows -------- Date: Thursday, 23-Nov-95 09:56 AM From: Marc James Small \ Internet: (msmall@roanoke.infi.net) From: Marc James Small \ Internet: (msmall@roanoke.infi.net) To: Jack Hamilton \ MCI Mail: (JHAMILTON / MCI ID: 202-2804) cc: leica-users \ Internet: (leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us) Subject: Re: too many words, not enough pictures >older f1.5 Noctilux Do you mean "older f/1.2 Noctilux" or "older f/1.5 Summarit"? Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! -------- REPLY, End of original message --------