[Leica] Leica apo 135mm M v. Canon 70-200 f/4 L zoom at 200mm with Canon

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica apo 135mm M v. Canon 70-200 f/4 L zoom at 200mm with Canon 2x extender
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 16:12:02 -0700
References: <3D5FF9C4-95F8-4EB2-81F6-21CA3BF3B2BE@mejac.carlsbad.ca.us> <BF3C368A-E503-42F1-B8FD-0DEBD85246B4@mac.com> <6c6b4e8485b92fbf1c9ebf65d2400b8d@reid.org>

I already knew the Leica 135 apo could seem more detail than the Canon L
series 70-200mm zoom at 200mm.  What about the Canon zoom at 200mm with a
Canon 2x extender?  I just tried both on my Sony a7c, focused on a distant
hilltop.

See https://www.paulroark.com/Canon-zoom-v-Leica-apo135.JPG .

Close, and no comparison on a weight & size adjusted basis.

For what it's worth,

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Replies: Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica apo 135mm M v. Canon 70-200 f/4 L zoom at 200mm with Canon 2x extender)
In reply to: Message from smithjeffery at mac.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Leica Elmar 90mm f4 LTM)