Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don, I have no problem with using little-known lenses if they are clean and work.? I have a Russian Jupiter-8 50/2.0 that would never focus at close distances on a Leica IIIf, but works fine on an SLR.? Turns out the Leica and Russian RF cams are different.? Then I have a Leica Summaron 35/3.5 that doesn't work because it is fogged. When I began to require glasses, I gave up on thread-mount Leicas and picked up a simple Exa in a pawn shop and used it for many years to take birthday and Christmas pictures, with and without flash, using a small Zeiss lens. Consignment shops often have complete kits for sale. My motto is, " If it works for you, don't sweat the pedigree!" On 6/6/21 4:02 PM, Don Dory via LUG wrote: > This isn't about a great lens I found. What I am really questioning is > using equipment that is "good enough" I stumbled on a 40mm Makro Kilfit > f3.5 D version at a stupidly cheap price. Even in Exacta mount that wasn't > an obstacle with a mirrorless body. It is a four element in three group > design. Using it I found it quite usable wide open if you kept the main > subject in the center third. Stopped down to 5.6-8 it was quite usable out > to the outer third. > > Even compared to the Leica 60mm Macro it is half the size and weight. So, > what is everybodies feelings about good enough even though modern > technology will be far superior? I know more than several members have > transitioned to the Q2 for the size, weight, and simplicity of use. > > Part of this is that younger photographers need a beginning place. Most of > us started out on used equipment that worked and as our fortunes and > interests matured we acquired better tools. My child didn't really get an > income that would support a lot of hobbies until thirty after the PhD. > Many folk don't get to that point so the tools need to be more reasonable > than a $2000 M body and a $500 foggy Russian lens. > > Anyway, thoughts? > -- Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA