Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A photo of my mother
From: reid at mejac.carlsbad.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:01:58 -0700
References: <776725f580e15313cf3199089cbc3584@mejac.carlsbad.ca.us> <401A1B0D-16F5-4A54-BE90-A1A8841A330A@frozenlight.eu> <DM6PR04MB54030DEB33F8460375E09A02B87C0@DM6PR04MB5403.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>


On 2020-07-17 12:09 pm, Aram Langhans via LUG wrote:
> ... Have you noticed that the Q2 RAW files are
> really nice, better than the Q2 JPEG files?  I did a comparison with
> my Nikon D750 and was amazed.  Begs the question does Leica apply a
> lot of magic dust to the RAW files?

As far as I know, the RAW file is literally that--the raw output of the 
sensor before any dust is applied. The computer inside the camera then 
generates the JPEG from the RAW. And might not do a very good job of it.

I delete the camera-generated JPEG files as soon as I upload the images. 
I work only with the RAW, and I use Lightroom or Photoshop to make a 
JPEG if I want one. I think I remember reading in the Q2 manual that you 
can set the quality of the generated JPEG; maybe yours is set to be low.



In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.carlsbad.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] A photo of my mother)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A photo of my mother)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] A photo of my mother)