Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/06/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Exchange. Surely Leica's manufacturing is normally as good as their repair. On 2020-06-19 4:52 pm, Aram Langhans via LUG wrote: > The Q2 has what is called Macro, but owning the 100/2.8 APO I have a > hard time calling it "Macro". Let's just say it focus close. Now, > with 47 MP, that does leave room for cropping. Here is what it can > do. View them LARGE. It is a Leica, after all. > > Full frame: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/misc/ff/Garden+Pansies-1000107.jpg.html > > A healthy crop to get me to what I would call Macro. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/misc/ff/Garden+Pansies-1000107-2.jpg.html > > And real pixel peeping. Cropped so it shows what 1:1 view in Lightroom > shows. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/misc/ff/Garden+Pansies-1000107-3.jpg.html > > Comments welcome. > > Unfortunately, my Q2 is going on a trip. What kind I am not sure. > After taking a few night star photos, I noticed the edges are not up > to par. And a distant landscape taken at 1.7 shows a marked > difference from left side to right side. I sent the photos to Leica > and their technician said something is wrong with the centering. It is > not normal. Now I have the personal debate. Should I just return it > to B&H for an exchange or should I send it in for repair. Not even > three weeks in my hands an exchange seems to be best, but it was > pointed out that if I send it in for repair they will fine-tune the > lens to perfection and I will know all is right. Of course it might > take months. And of course something else could go amiss in the > process. Tough choice. Anyone want to chime in as to what I should > do? > > Aram