Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The second one for me. I think photos of skydivers taken at or close to landing are more interesting than when they are high up. After, the landing is what determines whether you get to do it again ;-) but also having the ground elements in the frame make the image more interesting. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 21 May 2019, at 22:13, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > > For me, my Takumar 135/3.5 lens gives me the best options with skydivers. > > First, a high turn to maneuver into the wind: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190520-DSCF1277-2.JPG.html > > Then, another jumper's landing adjustment: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20190520-DSCF1275-2.JPG.html > > -- > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ >