Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2018/05/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] More with the Rolleiflex
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 19:34:02 -0700
References: <70A8545C-76D4-424B-A9DE-9560C78F040F@gmail.com> <MWHPR10MB16462A6533B384E590CB4A09B8810@MWHPR10MB1646.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> <002701d3e238$32e23d90$98a6b8b0$@ca> <EAFB0DF5-E87E-49B0-B0F2-9B55C0478BF5@rabinergroup.com>
I shot weddings when I was younger. I've done maybe 50.
I always used a Rollei 3.5 loaded with Verichrome Pan 120.
I carried a Leica IIIf as a backup but never needed it at a real
wedding.
120 film meant I didn't need a telephoto because I could do it in the
enlarger.
I always managed to find a way to shoot the whole-family shots without
needing a wide angle.
I borrowed a Rollei modified for 220 once. And the developing spools for
it. You should try loading 8 rolls of 220 into 8 24-exposure Nikkor
spools on a deadline. I got pretty good at loading 120, but 220 remained
a high-stress challenge. There was also the problem of hanging up 220
film to dry. It was close to 2 meters long. 120 remained a good
compromise.
Replies:
Reply from baroque-2 at inbox.com (Les Myers) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)