[Leica] Off & Tired Topic Warning: the Billingham Hadley Pro

[frank at f3documentaryphotography.com (Frank Farmer)]

Team,

I?ve been a Domke user for about a billion years. So, there?s that. In SLR 
land, I carried two F-2 bags: one for bodies and lenses, one for lights and 
remotes. In Leica M land, I always carried, and still do, a well-worn F-6 
(the ?little bit smaller bag?). The problem is just that, though: it?s 
well-worn. While is has many more miles on it, for sure, I?d like to have 
something not so worn for those times when such isn?t exactly the best 
option. 

I?m enticed by the Billingham Hadley Pro. I?ve been flummoxed, though, in my 
efforts to actually put my hands on one. New Orleans? No dice. DC? Same. 
Jackson? You?ve lost your mind.  I?m limited to my experience with various 
photos from the likes of the Billingham website and B&H, etc.

Here?s my query: Has anyone moved from a thicker bag like a Domke (the four 
compartment insert is a thing of beauty because one can always access each 
compartment) to a more slimline bag like the Billingham? How did it change 
your shooting style? Your storage style? Access? It appears that equipment 
will take more digging to access in the B?ham, for example. Is the 
experience more vertical? 

For reference, my current usual M kit consists of an M10, 35, 50, 90, flash 
w/ diffuser, and the normal accessories (extra battery, memory cards, lens 
cloth, pen, flashlight, glucose monitor (ok, fine, that?s not a normal piece 
of kit, and Leica doesn?t make one, but I have to carry one anyway). 
Sometimes, there is a super-wide with finder.

Thoughts? Anyone made that exact swap?

Here?s to my second totally subjective question in a week. Thanks for 
sharing your experiences. 

Frank F. Farmer
Jackson, Mississippi