Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]IMHO, personally it doesn't work for me. I found it distracting, keeping me wondering "what is it about these pictures?" all the time I was looking at them. Even at small scale I was aware of it. Peter On 02/11/2017 20:18, Ted Grant wrote: > Hi Tina, > Both are interesting, simply because the composition, content/subject are > strong enough and interesting enough they over ride any reticulation aspect > as seen here on screen. However? as a photo on say glossy photo paper there > might be a tiny bit of visual annoyance. > Not knowing about reticulation I bet 9 out of 10 viewers wouldn't see it. > Nor? They wouldn't be wise enough to understand reticulation?? > cheers > ted > Dr. ted grant O.C. :-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of > Tina Manley > Sent: November-01-17 12:58 PM > To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com; Leica Users Group; paw; seephoto; Olympus > Camera > Discussion > Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Reticulation > > PESO: > > I've run across some more of the reticulated film. This time it's street > scenes instead of people: > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/166499822 > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/166499996 > > Instead of trying to get rid of it, I enhanced it a little with contrast > and sharpening. Different enough to be a feature? > > Tina > -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig