Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Ted, I'm sure that the extra length, extra stop, and modern optics made it a much nicer package.? I'm just shooting for fun, not to make a living.? Good to hear from you again. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 9/14/2017 1:38 PM, Ted Grant wrote: > Hi Jim. > I had that 250mm lens also. But traded it when I purchased the 280mm 2.8. > It was pretty good > also. However the 280mm 2.8 along with the extenders was just incredible > and blew everything else out of the water. :-) I used it 99.9% of the time > hand held with a shoulder brace, pistol grip and motor drive SLR. > Once you had the rhythm of handling it? It became a piece of cake handling > it with sports events and crowds! > However these days???????? :-) I have no doubt it would be a "bit of > another story?" :-) > cheers, > ted > > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of Jim Nichols > Sent: September-14-17 10:54 AM > To: LUG at Leica-Users.org; Olympus Camera Discussion > Subject: [Leica] IMG: An Older Leica Lens > > Years ago, I purchased an older Leica lens from a former LUG member in > Nashville. It is a 1980 Telyt-R 250/4, a generation earlier than the > APO lenses. Tina's shots yesterday with Ted's great lens prompted me to > drag out the 250 and visit the butterflies. I mounted it on an old Star > D tripod and took it out to the Buddleia bush. Here are my favorites. > > Painted Lady: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20170914-DSCF5045.JPG.html > > Monarch: > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20170914-DSCF5067.JPG.html > > View them LARGE if you like. > > Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated. >