Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why Pros in general and us amateurs do NOT or SHOULD NOT use Leica......
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:36:12 +0000
References: <CANYyKx-cREVkavUuZ=eJ=yRr0TAq4hZYZOGDi34griv-d+2LVg@mail.gmail.com>

I have no idea why people compare simple mechanical cameras which do not 
require batteries (I have M2, Nikon F2 (plain prism) and 500C/M) with 
digital cameras. I used Fuji X-T1 and the results, for me, were nowhere 
close to what I get with Leica.

john

-----Original Message-----


On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr>wrote:

>......In the last 12 months, three sensors (M9, original Monochrom and
S2-P, plus currently on my third S AF failure), all carried out >free 
including shipping.....

===================================================================================================

Wow(?).   I used my (second-hand) M3 every day for 40 years, personally and
at work, and it is still going strong.  I'd still use it if I had a darkroom.

Loved my film Leicas, but I'm glad I saved a lot of money (and grief) by 
buying a Fuji body for all my diverse lenses.  No problems in three years.

-
Alan

Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 
Photo Services
(Retired)
UPAA Photographer of the Year 1978
UPAA Master of the Profession 2014
amr3 at uwm.edu
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/

"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate  for an inability to 
notice. " - Elliott Erwitt




Replies: Reply from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Why Pros in general and us amateurs do NOT or SHOULD NOT use Leica......)
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwmalumni.com (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Why Pros in general and us amateurs do NOT or SHOULD NOT use Leica......)