Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] A Tale of Two Butterflies
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:19:07 +0100
References: <352c1c0e-8c09-96c7-3be9-db41f23e322d@lighttube.net> <001d01d218d9$d10596e0$7310c4a0$@ca> <e50cf39a-7295-c1a1-04e7-ff8e6d8cb1ab@lighttube.net>
 
"Jim Nichols" <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote
>>>
> The discrepancies had been bugging me.  It just proves once again that we 
> shouldn't believe it to be true just because we found it on the internet.
>>>

Yes, there was a classic example of this on Youtube when someone posted a 
video showing how to load a film into a Rolleiflex. Sadly, it was done 
incorrectly, so any images would have been crap.  The outraged comments were 
hilarious.

Had a brief look for it just now but couldn't find it again.

Douglas
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] A Tale of Two Butterflies)
 In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] A Tale of Two Butterflies)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] A Tale of Two Butterflies)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] A Tale of Two Butterflies)