Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] SL Lens Choices
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:14:42 +0000
References: <5366890.1474194886451.JavaMail.wam@mswamui-bichon.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
Indeed, last time I looked I had Leica 280mm, 400mm 560mm (x2) and 
800mm......

john

-----Original Message-----


Nathan Wajsman wrote:

>>>
 If you need a 300mm lens then yes, Leica is not for you.
<<<

OTOH if you need a 280mm lens Leica is superb.

http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/trochilidae/calypte/anhumm40.html
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/ardeidae/botaurus/ambitt12.jpg

both: Leica SL, Leica 280mm f/4 APO-Telyt-R

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com
Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] SL Lens Choices)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] SL Lens Choices)