Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, Here are a pair of images that show the need for distortion correction and the corrected image. Please ignore the shapely girl and look at the sidewalk. :-) Image converted from RAW with no distortion correction applied: http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/No+Distortion+Correction+Applied.tif.html The same image once the PTLens distortion correction was applied: http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Corrected+Image.tif.html Incidentally, PTLens did not have data on this Fujinon 35/2.0 lens when I purchased the lens. I shot sample photos and sent them to them, and they added the correction to their stock list of corrections. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 8/10/2016 11:10 AM, Ted Grant wrote: > Hi Jim, > If you still have an un-corrected version? Would you please send it along > so > we can see the distortion compared to a corrected version? > Thank you most kindly. > cheers, > ted > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of > Jim Nichols > Sent: August-10-16 9:03 AM > To: LUG at Leica-Users.org; Olympus Camera Discussion > Subject: [Leica] IMG: Threatening Weather > > The weather locally has been hot and unsettled, with thunderstorms, both > heavy and light, showing up almost every day. The Fujinon 35/2.0 > captures it nicely, but the distortion of this lens must be corrected in > order to get the preferred straight lines. Comparisons by others have > shown that this lens has approximately three times the distortion of the > 35/1.4 lens, when left uncorrected. > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Threatening+Weather.tif.html > > Best viewed LARGE. > > Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated. >