Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This one looks fine in every respect. It would be interesting to see the unprocessed image just to have an idea of how much you had to do. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 16 Jun 2016, at 22:12, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > > I took the Culminar 85/2.8 out for one last checkout. I like this focal > length when used on the Fuji, but continue to find that the uncoated lens > elements produce a very low contrast image for me. With a lot of post > processing, I can get usable images, but feel that a modern, autofocus, > lens would be a better choice. > > Here is one image showing customer service at the airport. > > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Customer+Service.tif.html > > Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated. > > -- > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ >