Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Peter. Please see my reply to Jay, whose post I read just a couple of messages before I saw yours. Apparently LR and Preview are privy to the sensor information, though they clearly handle it in different ways. Now I understand. ?howard > On Feb 11, 2016, at 11:16 PM, Peter Klein <boulanger.croissant at > gmail.com> wrote: > > Howard: There is a little round sensor on the upper front area of the > digital Ms. The camera compares the amount of light this sensor receives > with the amount of light the main sensor receives though the lens, and > comes up with an estimated f-stop based on the difference. Like any > metering system, it can be fooled if the area measured and averaged is not > actually average (e.g. a high contrast scene). > > Leica has said that they don't consider the information accurate enough, > which I assume is why they don't put it in the standard EXIF field for the > f-number. Instead, it goes in the manufacturer's proprietary area. Some RAW > image editors see and transfer it to that standard field, and some don't. > There may be some difference in how the various editors interpret the > information, or how Leica derives it based on coding or manual entry. > > What I don't understand is why Capture One displays my M8's estimated > f-numbers, but not my (MM) Monchrom. > > --Peter