Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]AFAIK Jay B and I are the only two on this list with that lens, I never leave home with a camera without it. It may be the only lens or with a combination of 28/35/75 but it is always there. I may take a Noctilux, but it is still with me. It is that impressive a lens IMO.... john -----Original Message----- Agreed, entirely. And it?s why the expensive ?cron won?t make a difference for most people. And of course a fixed FL lens won?t effectively compete with a zoom until the sensor it images on has the pixel count that allows a 50%, 30%, 20% crop that gives the same FOV as a 50, 75, 120 mm zoom with nice detail. ?howard > On Dec 9, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com> wrote: > > Very surprising, and not my experience as a traveller/shooter I was > out shooting last night with a 35mm (50mm FF eq.) and missed my now sold 24-120 on a D700. > > Resolution i.e. l/mm is one (tiny) part of a photo, angle, depth of field and perspective matter to, me much more. > > Amities > Philippe > > Le 9 d?c. 2015 ? 19:50, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> a ?crit : > >> And this brings up the possibilities for dispensing with zooms and >> interchangeable lenses altogether for general purposes. If a camera >> with a fixed WA lens had a FF 200-MPx sensor and a digital zoom >> function, and an EVF, it would have the same capabilities as a big FF >> DSLR with a 24-120 zoom?even with a linear 1/5 crop, equivalent to a >> 5x zoom, >