Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:10:07 +0200
References: <13941AF8-16E8-4F64-AE4D-D0CA87F40BB6@btinternet.com> <D24403C2.49DCD%mark@rabinergroup.com>

What do you do with your pictures in Photoshop that cannot be done in
Lightroom? Genuine question.

I have used PS since early versions, looking at 2015 CC there is little
comparison to earlier versions so why hark back to LR v1?

john

-----Original Message-----

I do have Lightroom 1 since 2006 its still loaded on this computer and it
was the second version which really made it viable for image processing  as
well as browsing and organizing. The image manipulation stuff in this first
version is very minimal a few tweaks and they told you up front you'd be for
sure opening it in Photoshop with a touch of a button. I think it sold like
hotcakes and plenty of people have no intention of opening their images up
in anything if they really didn't have to and doing anything to them.  So
Lightroom became the digital program for digital photography and they added
the world "Photoshop" to it.

I asked a gal in a caf? sitting next to me if she used Photoshop. She said
yes. She used LightRoom.

History of LightRoom:

http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2012/10/24/the-history-of-lightroom/



On 10/14/15 11:25 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote:

> Not so Mark.
> 
> Even the first version of Lightroom had most of the photo-relevant 
> manipulation capabilities of the then current version of Photoshop.
> 
> It did have these functions organised differently, and added a 
> cataloging system suitable for photographers, but it was by no means just
a browser.
> 
> Who told you that it was a browser with add-ons as an afterthought? 
> Somebody has been really pulling the wool!
> 
> cheers,
> Frank
> 
> 
>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 15:37, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>> 
>> As LightRoom was designed to be a browser which as an afterthought 
>> had some picture "editing" as in processing: cropping etc 
>> capabilities put in as an afterthought and then developed with later
versions.
>> 
>> Photoshop itself was first designed as a program to make it so you 
>> could change a Tiff file to a Jpeg or other file formats back and forth.
>> When you do that the image would sometimes darken or lighten.
>> So they had to put controls in there to tweak that.
>> Hence Photoshop. It had another name at first.
> 
> 




Replies: Reply from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Reply from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Reply from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)