Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Q vs M for size
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:26:11 +1200
References: <019a01d0a64f$b4bd5ac0$1e381040$@mcmaster.co.nz> <557CF290.2030109@jayburleson.com>
 
I think my M with 28mm Summicron might be smaller......

http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Leica-Q_top1-1024x768.jpg

john

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Burleson

It can be, by a little bit, but then you get into the small body / huge lens
mismatch.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71E4shHGbjL._SL1500_.jpg

Jay

On 6/13/2015 8:10 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> First image I have seen with both...
>
> http://leicarumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/DSC0377.jpg
>
> I thought EVF was meant to be more compact than a rangefinder ;-)
>
> john
Replies: Reply from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Q vs M for size)
 In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Q vs M for size)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] Q vs M for size)