Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Was: Screw the Nocti, Now: 28mm And BeThere
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 21:56:43 +0000
References: <CAJ4y7gyGHGL79PD+JMjBBstMhTkP6kirE+NqdCP7f45rZweAog@mail.gmail.com> <5522FFDB.8010205@jayburleson.com>

28/50 is my preferred two lens kit

John

-----Original Message-----

Bob,
The main reason why I picked up the 28 was because after going through my 
Paris images, where I used my 35 quite a bit, I found that the images 
sometimes seemed a bit cramped with the 35 (and no further room to zoom with 
the feet), and I think could have been much better with the view of a 28.

So currently my bag will have a 21, 28, 50 in it for general travel use.

Jay

On 4/6/2015 7:13 AM, Robert Baron wrote:
> I bought the 28mm Summicron-M ASPH I think at about the time it was 
> released, IIRC at the Leica Seminar on Cape Cod in 2001.  I never got 
> comfortable with the focal length and sold it some years later.
>
> Now I'm thinking about buying a 28mm Elmarit-M 2.8 to use on my M240, 
> mainly when I'm traveling and don't want to carry my current 35mm Summilux.
>
> Is this good thinking?
>
> --Bob
>
>
> ===On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jay Burleson 
> <leica at jayburleson.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Erwin Puts:
>> "The Summicron-M 2/28 mm ASPH. is one of the crown jewels in the 
>> Leica scuderia of lenses. It is a superb lens and after twelve years 
>> in production still not surpassed."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2015 9:39 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe  on this thing we should find the specs. The MTF graphs. And 
>>> or some reviews by people who sound like they may know what  they're 
>>> talking about.
>>> Instead of relying on capricious or even malicious chat group gossip.
>>> I can speak for the finish of the lens a chrome version which looked 
>>> top Leica quality to me. If that accounts for much.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/6/15 12:24 AM, "Gene duprey" <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Interesting.  i remember several years ago everyone was praising 
>>> the 28
>>>> Chron.
>>>> I wonder what has changed?
>>>>
>>>> Gene
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2015 3:06:51 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Screw the Nocti...
>>>>
>>>> If I do street documentary, I would get a 28mm (again) for sure. I 
>>>> did most of my "Occupy" series with the 35 or 50mm, and I 
>>>> definitely would have loved a 28mm.
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately, the 28mm Cron is the unloved Leica-child, so one can 
>>>> get it for around $2500 now. A bargain compares to the Nocti :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, John McMaster 
>>>> <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Hi Mark, I think you should go back a reread your books ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> john
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Mark Rabiner
>>>>> Sent: Monday, 6 April 2015 6:08 a.m.
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Screw the Nocti...
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of us and most photographers I've ever met unless they were 
>>>>> just starting out had both a 28 and a 24. Nobody ever didn't have 
>>>>> either.
>>>>> That
>>>>> would be crazy. Its always been a basic focal length. Its one of 
>>>>> the frame lines in M's since the M2 in 1957.
>>>>> 


Replies: Reply from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Was: Screw the Nocti, Now: 28mm And BeThere)
In reply to: Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Was: Screw the Nocti, Now: 28mm And BeThere)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] Was: Screw the Nocti, Now: 28mm And BeThere)