Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have always been fascinated by different angles of view of camera lenses. Why manufacturers offered specific sets of focal lengths. And it always amused me that the specs usually call out the diagonal angle of view rather than the horizontal, as I think the horizontal is more relevant to the user. I looked up the different Leica focal lengths ever offered ( the 180 was a limited production lens, but I threw it in anyway) For 35mm Film proportions, the horizontal angle of view is 12mm 113 Degrees 15 100 16 97 18 90 21 84 24 74 25 72 28 65 35 55 40 49 50 40 73 28 75 27 85 24 90 23 135 15 180 11 One conclusion is that to get more "difference" the wider you go, the more you need to make it appear that there is a difference. ( a 24 mm lens does not appear to be that much wider than a 28, but a 90 appears a lot wider than a 135 although the angle of view difference is about the same) Which explains, to some degree, why certain combinations of focal length are more popular than others.. Other than in use for architecture, separating the angle of view by a "bit" is more relevant, as the alternative is to take a step back or forward. On our next trip, I will use this table to choose lenses.. Knowing that we will not be in tiny lanes and tight squares ( as in our last 2 trips), and will be focusing on larger areas of landscapes in general, I will go longer than before. Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net