Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am not going to check, but Nathan may have sent 5 original emails with links to 70 images rather than an almost 1:1 ratio which may have resulted in +60 emails (to five groups).... I am not on three of those groups, what comments do they make? john -----Original Message----- From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2015 8:49 a.m. To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part I'm going by Steve's comment: "The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per email, Tina 20 emails per pic." Tina On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > You are going by total emails rather than original emails with link(s) > to an image? > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > For March LUG, so far: > > Nathan - 106 e-mails > Tina - 155 e-mails > > Not quite 20 to 1. > > Tina > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Steve Barbour > <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > Steve Barbour > > > > On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Also, in the last week - since last Sunday, I have posted 13 photos > > on the LUG. You have posted 70. Is the difference that you are > > sharing and I am asking for help? > > > > The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per > > email, Tina > > 20 emails per pic. > > > > steve > > > > I asked before about posting them one at a time or saving them up > > and posting a group. The opinions seemed to be divided equally - > > some wanted one at at time, others preferred a group so I didn't > > change > anything. > > Maybe I should. > > > > Tina > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman > > <photo at frozenlight.eu> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Tina, > > > > > > May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many > > > photos, just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a > > > figure of 16000 > > from > > > your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize > > > that I am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also > > > understand that for > > your > > > stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but > > > still > > the > > > number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing > > > process, > > it > > > seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them. > > > Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for > > > your health? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nathan > > > > > > Nathan Wajsman > > > > > > Alicante, Spain > > > http://www.frozenlight.eu > > > http://www.greatpix.eu > > > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > > > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > > > > > > YNWA > > >