Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I did not find the SWC/M and 50mm too close, you may find a 60mm too close to an 80mm so go for the 100mm and 180mm ;-) john ________________________________________ From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> I still might not get the 60 Distagon. First of all, I still need to get a body :-) Second, I already have a SWC/M and 60mm may be "too close"? Not sure. Certainly, it might be pointless to get both a 80 and a 60, especially the budget thing. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:04 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > Give it time, you would not have bought a Hasselblad 60mm 15 or 20 years > ago ;-) > > john > ________________________________________ > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > > Hey John, some of us are in the poor house! > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:33 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > > > Only 10,000 for the Monochrom. Also if you feel the Hassleblad Zeiss > > lenses giving the Leica M lenses a run for the money try the Leica S > > 45mm....... ;-) > > > > john > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > > > > Yes, I know ISO 1600 is so yesterday with MM going up to ISO 100,000, but > > hey if anything can give Leica a run for the money, it would be the > > Hasselblad Zeiss lens... > > > > Just a test of the 60 Distagon I am renting. Tri-X ISO 1600 (why 1600? > > Because I was taking some very dark indoor scenes earlier) with Diafine. > > Pretty sweet... > > > > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20150303-Scanned-805.jpg > > > > -- > > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto > > // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits > >