[Leica] The myths of crop factor

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The myths of crop factor
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 04:06:31 +0000
References: <18279354.1420514340365.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <D0D0C63E.2F85D%mark@rabinergroup.com>

From: Mark Rabiner

>  A 20% crop is nothing for me.

So getting close to a well composed APS-C size ;-)

> I used to balk when people would say a DSLR replaced a Hasselblad.
> Now I half agree with it.

I have said that my handheld M9 shots were sharper than tripod mounted 
Hasselblad B&W negs but lacked the same tonal range, then the Monochrom was 
released...

John

Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The myths of crop factor)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] The myths of crop factor)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The myths of crop factor)