Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter, I know that by May 13 2001, you were at the SLUGfest in Magnolia; I have a photo of you with Mark Davison & R.P. Johnson but you don't have a camera in hand. I'll try to get it scanned. Jay On 10/15/2014 5:23 PM, Peter Klein wrote: > I believe I've been here since the year 2000. I'd been shooting with a > IIIf, and was hoping to get back into the M system after many years > absence. I came for information about what older lenses were still viable. > I stayed for the photography and the great group of people I met. > > Rangefinder photography is both a way of seeing and a way of being. That > way has been tied up with Leica for nearly a century. The lenses are > superb, the form factor works beautifully. You know what you've focused > on, and you can see what you shot while you shoot it. I really don't care > about the bling oriented marketing, and I do wish that the prices hadn't > gone stupid bleeping crazy. Fortunately, there is the used market, and > keeping the things you buy for a long time. > > Like many, I've worked with other cameras as well. Like the famous Kyle > Cassidy, I learned digital playing with an early Nikon COOLPIX. In recent > years, some shoulder and eye problems made micro 4/3 cameras the line of > least resistance. There's nothing to apologize for ? they are versatile > little beasties, and the lenses, especially the primes, are pretty darn > good. > > But there's nothing quite like a Leica. As you can see from my other > thread today, I'm coming back to my ancient M8 that the glitterati don't > take seriously anymore. And, there's the possibility that I will do > something (financially) stupid bleeping crazy in the foreseeable future. > After all, an M 240 or a Monochrom is less expensive than a little red > sports car. :-) > > --Peter, dictating to my iPad > (If it misconstrues, please excuse)