Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Statistics
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:00:59 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1CN0QYEFR0aJR4KRHnyJePbPnqoTwE-ZHG18S7Qja3pEA@mail.gmail.com>

Interesting numbers, Tina.  Thx

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/13/2014 4:25 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> PESO:
>
> This is the kind of thing you can research when you have LR ;-)
>
> I have finally finished editing all of the photos from Honduras.  I took
> 1839 photos in all:  869 with the Fuji, 549 with the M240, and 411 with the
> MM.
>
> Of those, I deleted 243 that were out of focus: 206 with the Fuji, 23 with
> the M240, and 14 with the MM.
>
>  From the remaining, I gave my highest rating of 4 stars to 103 photos: 33
> with the Fuji, 22 with the M240, and 48 with the MM.
>
> Of the 7 lenses I used, the ones that did the best were the Leica 35/2.0,
> Leica 50/1.4, and Leica 90/2.0.
>
> What I have concluded is that I love the results I get with the MM.  I will
> be carrying it more often in the future, along with those three lenses.
>
> I'm not giving up on the Fuji, but it certainly did not solve my focusing
> problem and I was encouraged by the number that I did get in focus with the
> Leicas!  Maybe all of that focusing I did with the Auto-refractor helped 
> ;-)
>
> I hope this is interesting to some.  It was invaluable to me.  I'll be
> posting some of the 4's next week.
>
> Tina



Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Statistics)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Statistics)