Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A couple of other things in favour of the M (or M(240) as there is no M10); Liveview/EVF is available for accurate focussing or using SLR lenses, it has greater dynamic range than the M9 and feels nicer to use IMO... john -----Original Message----- If the price is the same (which sounds really weird) then you should obviously buy the M10 and not the M9. It has better high ISO performance, more functionality and is still supported by Leica with firmware upgrades. But still, I am amazed that any retailer would sell both cameras for the same price. Either their M9 price is absurdly high or their M10 price is absurdly low. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ On Apr 23, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Roger Hart wrote: > I've been away from the LUG for a bit, but am now interested in > upgrading from M8 for a full-frame M camera. I'm looking for any > reasons LUGers might have for not buying an M (besides price). I see > that my favorite retailer is selling M and M9 bodies at the same > price. Are they equal cameras? Why buy one over the other? I would > love to hear some of our residents experts weigh in on the topic. > > Thanks in advance. All the best from sunny Michigan. > > > Roger Hart > Ann Arbor >