Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DNG
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 01:52:06 +0000
References: <CAH1UNJ1pQRu_yu3gA2p7D17pxLQ354+NeTVm9mXy7ySoXrNmHw@mail.gmail.com> <D4085232-040E-483C-90EF-E2EA32206193@acm.org> <1397319653.52647.YahooMailNeo@web87704.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <C9531117-5A7A-476F-BEF9-10AE8CF168EE@acm.org>

But do they care.....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/11/apple_has_three_times_as_much_cash_as_us_govt_twice_the_uk/

john

-----Original Message-----

I'll second that. 

Would it be different if Steve Jobs were still alive? I wonder. I suspect he 
replaced interest in Mac's friendly interface with that of iPhone.

Herbert Kanner
kanner at acm.org
650-326-8204


On Apr 12, 2014, at 9:20 AM, FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at btinternet.com> 
wrote:

> Maybe. I have always wondered. I keep all my raw files in the native 
> format, so the only DNGs I have are from my Leica. I am not happy to trust 
> any single software vendor to have my interests at heart, including Adobe.
> With the loss of functionality/en-iPhonification of Macs by the latest OS 
> update, with enhancements of little use to me, this particular Mac user 
> with almost 30 years of Mac ownership is not a contented guy any more when 
> it comes to software...
> 
> 
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org>
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2014, 4:21
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] DNG
>> 
>> 
>> Sounds like BS to me. Opinions from any experts among you?
>> 
>> Herbert Kanner
>> kanner at acm.org
>> 650-326-8204
>> 
>> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>> From a Nikon list about DNG for what it is worth - I have no idea 
>>>> if it is
>>> true or not. I do not use DNG format, so it is of little concern to 
>>> me, but those who do might want to check it out:
>>> 
>>> Quote
>>> Worth noting that DxO Optics Pro does not (cannot, will not) open 
>>> DNG files for the following reasons:
>>> 
>>> "Regarding DNG files. We do not offer currently support for 
>>> converted DNG files in Optics Pro or any of our other produces. 
>>> Though DNG converted files contain the original RAW file 
>>> information, the information is no longer exactly as the camera body 
>>> wrote it. RAW files are encrypted by their manufacturers, and in 
>>> order to use the information in these files, we must decrypt the 
>>> information using precise information provided to us. To do this, it 
>>> is critical that the information in the file be exactly as it was 
>>> written by the camera, down to the exact location of the data within 
>>> the file. When you convert the original RAW file to the DNG format, the 
>>> decryption information we have fails because the data has been moved.
>>> Optics Pro is a far more precise program than the other programs you 
>>> noted, so it is imperative that all information be as the camera 
>>> originally wrote it to your camera card. Therefore, we currently do 
>>> not have any immediate plans to offer converted DNG support for input 
>>> files.  DxO Support Team "
>>> Unquote
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>> 


Replies: Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] DNG)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] DNG)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] DNG)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] DNG)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] DNG)