Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This discussion started off as a comment on discontinuing the R system in favor of the S. My point was and remains that Leica made a decision that the R market was too big and competitive for them to play in, where Leica innovations and image quality at the projected selling price would make the market too small to them to presumably make a profit. So they decided on the D-MF market. >From a May 2013 interview by Forbes Magazine of Leica's Stephan Schulz, the >Head of Professional Photo at Leica Camera AG: "There are no industry-wide figures, but we think the core medium format market is roughly 6000 units per year ? worldwide, for all brands. We are not yet the market leader (I estimate Phase One to have 40-45% market share), but we already have 20% share ? and this is only after 3 years after introduction." Interpolating this data..... 6000 * 20% = 1200 cameras per year..... ( if you assume that Schulz is talking about Unit market share and not Dollar market share) Have then had some degree of success? The noted 20% market share says yes. The fact that they remain in that business says the company is sufficiently happy with the inroads that have been able to make and the profits or losses thereby. Circling back to the original discussion, and based on data we now have on the S system, comparing it back to the R system, .... Would Leica have sold 1200 R10's at prices that would have been 50-100% above the competition? There are enough Leica nuts ( myself included) out there that the answer is most likely ....Yes...... After all, to own an M lens, we spend 10-20 times the price of mainstream lenses to own the Leica brand.... And with that, a dead horse. Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net