Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 21:42:59 -0700
References: <7CD3D193-C3E2-4953-9D6C-02FCEB36744B@icloud.com><097401cf5126$41150f20$c33f2d60$@verizon.net> <90A38D06-78E2-402A-AB60-FA869591F9A9@acm.org>
 
Frank Filippone  offered:

>>>> Otherwise, the only difference is that without the coding, the camera 
>>>> can
> not place any info in the EXIF file about the lens being 
> used.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I JUST HAVE TO ASK?

WHO THE HELL CARES? AND WHAT DOES IT DO TO MAKE MY PHOTOGRAPH LOOK BETTER 
AND WORTHY OF MY DAY RATE CHARGES???????????

The more I read of this coding crap the more I become absolutely convinced 
it's nothing more than a bunch of techie crap to charge more money for 
nothing more than a pile of useless techie crap!

Not one iota of this coding allows a photographer to take superior moments 
of captured visual moments of life!

cheers,
Dr. ted
Replies: Reply from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
 In reply to: Message from pkolodny1 at icloud.com (Pablo Kolodny) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)