Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] NZ PAW 07
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:06:15 +0000
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E689085A@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <E87C3F67-C32F-45F5-B152-23C8FD483B8E@icloud.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E68CE0EE@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <2663522A-51DA-4DAE-B185-222FA117C6A1@icloud.com>

I was using some lenses without an ND filter unusually, so yes some more DoF 
for some as a change as well as some 35mm and 50mm more often (frequently 
75mm/90mm or equivalent) - things may revert this week ;-) First set of B&W 
are 50mm, colour are 96MM equivalent and last two B&W are 35mm (35mm and 
50mm Summilux but stopped down!)

john

-----Original Message-----


On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:40 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> Thanks George, do they look much different to 'usual'? It is a very small 
> patch I wander around :-(
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> On Feb 14, 2014, at 4:00 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> 
>> I had been thinking that the Monochrom was not being used much so....
>> 
>> http://johnmcmaster.com/PAW/2014/07/
> 
> Interesting set.
> 
> It appears that you've left your comfort zone a bit; perhaps?

not "much"

subtle to my eye

a tad more depth of focus in some

a bit more space or lines or forms within the frame

perhaps?

or could be just me

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 07)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] NZ PAW 07)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 07)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] NZ PAW 07)