Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 21, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Steve Barbour wrote: > I would like to know what the real facts are, based on real world data, > with carefully done comparisons. And if the cameras in question have flaws > in some areas, I will use the cameras accordingly, always the case for all > of us. The only possible "real facts are, based on real world data, with carefully done comparisons." will be done by individual users with their gear and their requirements. And those are called "anecdotal." If it works for "you" or "me" that's about as "careful" as we can get. If it doesn't work for "you" or "me" that's equally "care full." After all is said and done "acceptable" has little to nothing to do with "rah rah forums." And everything to do with individual technical, ergonomic, aesthetic, and budgetary requirements. Complete understanding of what situation? Portrait studio? Street photography? Wild life? Bird specific? Landscape? Still life? Advertising agency? Travel? Ultra wide? Ultra long? Ultra big prints? Snap shots? Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist