Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2014/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R
From: jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel (gmail))
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:23:26 -0800
References: <CF2BB9E0.185C5%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5321466E-C881-40C2-AB08-4C66A30B3654@gmail.com> <CAFfkXxsWcCic2qhJegHpoerEnFh1ZB7zm6_47qHdVhUkn9hGww@mail.gmail.com> <2B9DDEAB-D9F4-4E7F-B0CD-663F5090D7D7@gmail.com> <3F24E644-A878-4172-AF84-EEEDBBAF40DC@gmail.com> <1F81C9A1-127D-466E-BA2E-DBD3A9E9F883@gmail.com> <FE5E005E-0ED3-405D-ABAE-20D035F8AD35@gmail.com>
That much is certain, Steve. We don't have any good quantifiable data yet.
And I think reasonable people could argue that it may not even matter as
long as people are using the tool and it's doing the job for them. I have
sort of come to that conclusion myself with regard to the Micro 4/3, which I
have been using for some time now. I had always fixated on obtaining the
best image quality. But the m4/3 system taught me that handling and that
elusive joy-of-use factor are just as important. Because those are the
things that influence the likelihood of actually getting the shot,
regardless of image quality, and whether or not you'll actually have the
camera in your hand when the opportunity presents itself.
Replies:
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel (gmail)) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Gmail) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel (gmail)) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)