Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I 'm compelled to post with regard to this issue, despite having no clear resolution to the dispute. I think I've sent in a coupla snaps for all of the yearbooks so far (not sure since I haven't bought the yearbooks themselves) and I believe this is the first year that I sent in stuff not shot with Leica gear. This was in fact a very deliberate decision, because I can no longer deny the fact that Leica gear is no longer serving the requirements of the kinds of snaps that I shoot which I think people might want to look at for a few seconds. I shoot my Leica film gear (M6, CL, IIIa, mostly with 50's, sometimes with a 35) on a pretty regular basis. However, these rigs (loaded with B&W film) are now mostly deployed for personal work. The two shots I submitted for this yearbook were shot with a 400 and a 15, both images recorded by a Nikon D800. When I shoot long (and in color) I want a non-rangefinder digital, and the DMR really isn't the thing for me. When I shoot ultrawide I like to use the foreground, and the parallax error from using an accessory finder usually ruins my intention. However, at the core of most of what I shoot there's an orientation that comes from a perspective that has resulted from years of M & R use. When it comes to shooting a particular thing these days I use whatever I have available that works for the task. Nikon, Sony, Leica, Rollei, Pentax, Minox, iPhone, whatever works. Bob Palmieri