Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would say that most (all?) SLR standard lenses are retrofocus. The Nikon F bayonet has a 46.5mm register distance, so a 50mm lens would need its optical centre 3.5mm from the bayonet...... john > -----Original Message----- > > The Zeiss people at Zeiss Day here a couple of weeks ago deny its a > retrofocal > design like a traditional wide angle Zeiss. They seem to have gone "Kodak" > with their naming using paper names to name slide projectors and so on. Any > name which sells the most gets used on the next product regardless on what > that might be. > > I also think it would tricky to incorporate a retrofocal design into a > normal > focal length lens. A retrofocal design is in effect looking through a > telescope > backwards. How to get a normal outa that? > > Mark William Rabiner > Photographer > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > On 11/22/13 12:04 PM, "Paul Roark" <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote: > > > John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > > > > Their optics seem quite good (bar the zoom), but look to be standard > > SLR > >> style design ... > > > > > > Notice that the new Zeiss super "Otus" 55mm is a "Distagon" > > (retrofocus design). What an irony. I switched from SLR to > > rangefinder largely to get away from the inferior retrofocus wide > > angles, and now I may be forced back to them by the digital sensor's > > needs. (I have no plans to buy that Otun > > lens.) > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > >